Re: [xmlvm-dev] Re-integrated skeleton branch

[Sascha H. <sa...@gm...>]

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Panayotis Katsaloulis <
pan...@pa...> wrote:

> So to sum up, please correct me if I didn't understand something:
>
> 1) For all inner classes in the compatibility library, we make sure that
> none of them is anonymous
>

If you don't want them to be cross-compiled or skeleton-ized (which you
probably never want), yes. And make sure to add the XMLVMIgnore annotation
to them. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a way to append annotations
to anonymous classes.


>
> 2) the option "--gen-wrapper" is no longer there
>

Exact.


>
> 3) the option "gen-c-wrappers" is there, and more clever, but no interface
> change
>

There never was such an option. There is an ant target of that name and an
XMLVM target of that name. Absolutely no interface change. You never ran
--gen-wrapper on non-skeleton classes anyway. In the past, "gen-wrapper" was
enabled for all classes in the processing pipeline. Now it is just enabled
for those classes with XmlvmSkeletonOnly. The name "--gen-wrapper" was
misleading anyway, because it didn't do what you might have thought. It
didn't generate wrapper but generated skeletons.

// Sascha


>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
> Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
> next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
> developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
> _______________________________________________
> Xmlvm-developers mailing list
> Xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-developers
>