Re: [xmlvm-dev] NSSelector

[Arno P. <ar...@pu...>]

I am absolutely OK with the patch. I personally have favored making use 
of strongly typed API when creating the Java Cocoa API and that is what 
you do for NSSelector.

HOWEVER: your patch does not make the necessary changes to the C 
backend. If you commit the patch as-is, it will break the C backend. Its 
OK to continue to do work on the Objective-C backend while we are still 
in transition, but I would expect that whatever change is done to the 
Objective-C backend is also done with the C backend.

Arno


On 3/23/2011 9:17 AM, Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote:
> After some previous discussions, I have decided to have a better view at the
> NSObject.performSelector method.
>
> Here is a proposal, to fix it before I start making drastic changes:
>
> http://xmlvm-reviews.appspot.com/111006
>
> This patch is far from being ready for submission, it is more to have a look at the API first.
> The two important files are:
> http://xmlvm-reviews.appspot.com/111006/diff/1/src/xmlvm2objc/compat-lib/java/org/xmlvm/iphone/NSObject.java
> and
> http://xmlvm-reviews.appspot.com/111006/patch/1/3
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> PS: I was a bit influenced by this object:
> http://www.spice-of-life.net/wodock/api/com/webobjects/foundation/NSSelector.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
> growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
> are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software
> be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker
> today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
> _______________________________________________
> Xmlvm-developers mailing list
> Xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-developers