|
From: Markus H. <ma...@ti...> - 2011-03-22 07:05:01
|
Hi,
disabling the warnings does wonders to xcode4 :D
I get the following error with the table patch:
In file included from /Users/markus/Documents/workspace/Kinderlieder/dist/../build/xcode/src/app/native_java_util_Locale.m:9:
/Users/markus/Documents/workspace/Kinderlieder/dist/../build/xcode/src/lib/iphone/org_xmlvm_iphone_NSString.h:37: error: 'XMLVM_ITABLE_SIZE_org_xmlvm_iphone_NSString' undeclared here (not in a function)
Here is the relevant generated snippet. As you can see it uses XMLVM_ITABLE_SIZE_org_xmlvm_iphone_NSString, but that is not defined in the whole project.
// Class declarations for org.xmlvm.iphone.NSString
XMLVM_DEFINE_CLASS(org_xmlvm_iphone_NSString, 6, XMLVM_ITABLE_SIZE_org_xmlvm_iphone_NSString)
Greetings,
Markus
Am 20.03.2011 um 18:24 schrieb Arno Puder:
>
> the vtable patch is the way to go, although we can't commit it yet. It
> doesn't make sense to invest time and effort to fix the HEAD. One
> problem with the vtable patch is that it causes many compiler warnings
> (this will be fixed). Unfortunately Xcode doesn't behave well with many
> warnings which is probably what you meant with beachballing (get a
> rebate on those $4! ;) ). In the Xcode project settings, select "Inhibit
> all warnings" and try to compile again.
>
> Arno
>
>
> On 3/20/11 3:18 AM, Markus Heberling wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> unfortunaltly XCode now beachballs everytime if I have the vtable patch applied, so can't give you the errors I got...
>>
>> But I started xmlvm (without the vtable patch) with debug output and got this for the affected class:
>>
>> [java] [03/20/11 11:02:47.869] DEBUG: Size of vtable for class com.sun.media.sound.ModelInstrumentComparator: 13
>> [java] [03/20/11 11:02:47.869] DEBUG: Implemented interfaces:
>> [java] [03/20/11 11:02:47.869] DEBUG: java.util.Comparator
>> [java] [03/20/11 11:02:47.869] DEBUG: compare: 11 = 12
>> [java] [03/20/11 11:02:47.869] DEBUG: equals: 1 = 1
>> ...
>> [java] [03/20/11 11:02:52.066] DEBUG: Vtable index for com.sun.media.sound.ModelInstrumentComparator.compare: 11
>>
>> The funny thing is, that it is working for other classes that implement interfaces, like LinkedList etc...
>>
>> Any hint where in the code I could poke around to get this fixed?
>>
>> Markus
>>
>> Am 18.03.2011 um 20:21 schrieb Arno Puder:
>>
>>>
>>> what errors do you get?
>>>
>>> On 3/18/11 12:20 PM, Markus Heberling wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I did ant clean in xmlvm and in my project several times.
>>>>
>>>> Markus
>>>>
>>>> Am 18.03.2011 um 20:14 schrieb Arno Puder:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> did you do an "ant clean"? You probably have an old cache on your system.
>>>>>
>>>>> Arno
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/18/11 12:09 PM, Markus Heberling wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I applied the patch, but unfortunately I can't compile the XCode project
>>>>>> afterwards. I get different errors every time or XCode beachballs and
>>>>>> doesn't compile at all...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 17.03.2011 um 22:02 schrieb Arno Puder:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh! I'm sorry. I thought you were another Markus!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you please check the review system. There is a patch by another
>>>>>>> Markus that will probably fix your problem. We hope to commit that
>>>>>>> patch soon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Arno
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Markus Heberling<ma...@ti...
>>>>>>> <mailto:ma...@ti...>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm trying to convert a class that implements the Comparator
>>>>>>>> interface with the c-backend. Unfortunately using that class as a
>>>>>>>> comparator (e.g. in Arrays.sort) gives a EXC_BAD_ACCESS. In the
>>>>>>>> included source snippet, you can see, that the
>>>>>>>> com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator_compare___javax_sound_midi_Instrument_javax_sound_midi_Instrumentfunction
>>>>>>>> is bound to
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.vtable[11]. But a
>>>>>>>> little bit later in the interface vtable
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.vtable[12]is
>>>>>>>> used, which is unset and leads to the error. I have manually changed
>>>>>>>> the 12 to 11 in that line and the code works fine after that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> void __INIT_IMPL_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> if(!__TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.classInitializationBegan)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.classInitializationBegan=
>>>>>>>> 1;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> // Initialize base class if necessary
>>>>>>>> if(!__TIB_java_lang_Object.classInitialized)
>>>>>>>> __INIT_IMPL_java_lang_Object();
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.newInstanceFunc=
>>>>>>>> __NEW_INSTANCE_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator;
>>>>>>>> // Copy vtable from base class
>>>>>>>> XMLVM_MEMCPY(__TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.vtable,
>>>>>>>> __TIB_java_lang_Object.vtable, sizeof(__TIB_java_lang_Object.vtable));
>>>>>>>> // Initialize vtable for this class
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.vtable[11] =
>>>>>>>> (VTABLE_PTR)
>>>>>>>> &com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator_compare___javax_sound_midi_Instrument_javax_sound_midi_Instrument;
>>>>>>>> // Initialize vtable for implementing interfaces
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.numImplementedInterfaces=
>>>>>>>> 1;
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.implementedInterfaces=
>>>>>>>> (__TIB_DEFINITION_TEMPLATE* (*)[1])
>>>>>>>> XMLVM_MALLOC(sizeof(__TIB_DEFINITION_TEMPLATE*) * 1);
>>>>>>>> __INIT_IMPL_FOR_CLASS_java_util_Comparator(&__TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.implementedInterfaces[0][0]);
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.implementedInterfaces[0][0]->vtable[11]
>>>>>>>> = __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.vtable[12];
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.implementedInterfaces[0][0]->vtable[1]
>>>>>>>> = __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.vtable[1];
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.declaredFields=
>>>>>>>> &__field_reflection_data[0];
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.numDeclaredFields= sizeof(__field_reflection_data)
>>>>>>>> / sizeof(XMLVM_FIELD_REFLECTION_DATA);
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.constructorDispatcherFunc=
>>>>>>>> constructor_dispatcher;
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.declaredConstructors=
>>>>>>>> &__constructor_reflection_data[0];
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.numDeclaredConstructors=
>>>>>>>> sizeof(__constructor_reflection_data) /
>>>>>>>> sizeof(XMLVM_CONSTRUCTOR_REFLECTION_DATA);
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.methodDispatcherFunc=
>>>>>>>> method_dispatcher;
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.declaredMethods=
>>>>>>>> &__method_reflection_data[0];
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.numDeclaredMethods=
>>>>>>>> sizeof(__method_reflection_data) / sizeof(XMLVM_METHOD_REFLECTION_DATA);
>>>>>>>> __CLASS_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator=
>>>>>>>> XMLVM_CREATE_CLASS_OBJECT(&__TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator);
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.clazz=
>>>>>>>> __CLASS_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator;
>>>>>>>> __CLASS_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator_ARRAYTYPE=
>>>>>>>> XMLVM_CREATE_ARRAY_CLASS_OBJECT(__CLASS_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator,
>>>>>>>> 1);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> __TIB_com_sun_media_sound_ModelInstrumentComparator.classInitialized= 1;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't have enough knowledge of the c backend, so I can't find the
>>>>>>>> place where to correct this in the source myself...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (And yes, you see correctly, that I'm trying to do MIDI in there :D)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
>>>>>>>> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
>>>>>>>> for your organization - today and in the future.
>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Xmlvm-developers mailing list
>>>>>>>> Xml...@li...
>>>>>>>> <mailto:Xml...@li...>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-developers
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Xmlvm-developers mailing list
> Xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-developers
|