From: Panayotis K. <pan...@pa...> - 2011-01-08 13:25:51
|
On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Sascha Haeberling wrote: > I think we don't have to worry. Here is my simple reasoning: > XMLVM LGPL, not GPL. From my understanding, GPL and LGPL have exactly the same requirements in case of distribution. Their only basic difference is if a non-gpl project is able to link on them or not. > Most parts of WebKit is under LGPL as well > Apple uses WebKit in their mobile browser with no problem Well, this doesn't prove anything; they are not going to take down their own browser :) But for an independent project, it would be a good excuse to remove it (if it contains [L]GPL code), if someone else complains about it. |