Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs

[Barry L. <bar...@ao...>]

Is the modularization work taking place on a branch somewhere? If you let me know the areas that are problematic, I'd be interested in trying to help out.


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Arno Puder <ar...@pu...>
To: Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...>
Cc: xmlvm-users <xml...@li...>
Sent: Thu, Sep 30, 2010 8:47 am
Subject: Re: [xmlvm-users] Using OpenJDK classes instead of built-in stubs




We are still struggling modularizing OpenJDK in order to reduce dependencies. Those hand-written classes you see will eventually be replaced. Note that the C backend is still work in progress.


Arno

On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Barry Linsdau <bar...@ao...> wrote:




 

When I run:

  java -jar xmlvm.jar --in=myapp.jar --target=iphone-c --app-name=MyApp

I wind up with with my nicely converted code, but there's only the minimal set of core java classes, all of which appear to be hand-written. One thing my app uses that is completely missing from the generated code is java.util.TreeMap.

Should these missing classes be automatically converted from the classes in openjdk6-build.jar? I read something on the mailing list that suggested that this was going to happen, but it doesn't seem to be happening now.

If not, is there a way I can generate the classes from openjdk6-build.jar as part of my project? If not, is this a planned feature for the near future? Or is this something that is supported by the "iphone" target but not the "iphone-c" target yet?





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev

_______________________________________________
xmlvm-users mailing list
xml...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users