From: Sascha H. <sa...@xm...> - 2010-09-23 08:49:40
|
Sure, try the second approach and see how it works. Switching it around in case it's not optimal should be easy. // Sascha 2010/9/23 Panayotis Katsaloulis <pan...@pa...> > On 23 Σεπ 2010, at 11:41 π.μ., Sascha Haeberling wrote: > > > Well, one of the things we will need to do for the cross-compilation of > Android projects is to add the Android SDK. We can do this two ways: Either > we put it into a JAR, just like the OpenJDK JAR or we assume the developer > has Android installed and use an environment flag to point to the classes. > > > > The advantage of the latter is that we don't blow up the size of our > repository and one-jar further and I guess we can assume that every dev has > Android installed. > > > These are my exact thoughts. > In the beginning I was towards the first solution, but now I am more in > favor of the second, even if compilation of Android demos with XMLVM will > not be "out of the box", and some manual tuning of XMLVM config files should > be required (and will be documented). > > If you agree, I can go on with the second approach :) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > |