Re: [xmlvm-users] XMLVM changes to synchronization

[Paul P. <bay...@gm...>]

Yes, you are correct.  It is commented out.  It could be deleted entirely
though.

Thanks,
Paul

2010/7/29 Panayotis Katsaloulis <pan...@pa...>

>
> On 28 Ιουλ 2010, at 8:44 μ.μ., Arno Puder wrote:
>
> >
> > I just committed your patch. Nice job, Paul!
> >
> > Arno
> >
>
> Now that I see the patch again, I have this comment on this part of the
> code:
> //- (void)dealloc {
> //
> //// TODO is it okay to have this method since this IS currently a category
> of NSObject? I.e. I want to make sure the real dealloc is called & I can't
> call super dealloc on NSObject
> //
> //      objc_setAssociatedObject(self, &memberKey, nil,
> OBJC_ASSOCIATION_ASSIGN);
> //      [super dealloc];
> //}
>
> AFAIK the associated object is automatically released when the main object
> is deallocated. So I think this code is not required at all, I think.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
> Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
> of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>