From: Robert E. <ro...@li...> - 2010-07-07 20:39:51
|
Looking further it would seem that the xmlvm representation doesn't store any such annotation based data either. Just trying to get a feel for what is and isn't possible. On 7 Jul 2010, at 21:28, Robert Elliot wrote: > Hi, > > I've been digging around in XMLVM primarily from the perspective of being interested in writing client side browser code in Java, and it's very impressive. As far as I can see annotating a member of a Java class with a runtime retention annotation makes no difference whatsover to the resulting JavaScript - is that correct? Is that in inherent limitation of JavaScript, or just something that is not yet supported? If the latter, is it on the road map in any form? > > A closer look suggests that actually neither the java.lang.annotation nor the java.lang.reflect packages are implemented in xmlvm2js, which I guess would make runtime retained annotations useless anyway as there would be no mechanism to interrogate them. Any possibility of this happening? > > Thanks for any thoughts, > Rob > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |