From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2010-05-25 06:37:48
|
I just commented out the faulty optimization in the repository. I don't think it makes sense to add a parameter for something that doesn't work. Arno On 5/25/10 8:22 AM, Panayotis Katsaloulis wrote: > > On 24 Μαϊ 2010, at 8:19 μ.μ., Joshua Melcon wrote: > >> Panayotis, >> >> This particular issue can occur in a variety of places. In general >> they are very hard to detect unless you get lucky at runtime. I >> strongly recommend commenting out: >>>> // new ExcessRetainsOptimization().Process(curRun.allCodePaths, curRun.beenTo, >>>> // codeElement); >> >> in order to prevent any other nasty surprises. >> >> Regards, >> >> -- Joshua Melcon >> > > > Probably then this should be default for xmlvm? > Or what about a (hidden/advanced?) parameter for xmlvm which will turn this on and off? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |