Re: [xmlvm-users] Apple agreements

[Arno P. <ar...@pu...>]

I agree. This list should focus on technical discussions around XMLVM 
and not Apple's business practices. I myself am an academic and my 
interest is to create new concepts and push the envelope of technology. 
As a variation of Tor's words: no one forces you to use XMLVM. I wish 
someone would comment on the amazing work that Panayotis has contributed 
this weekend.

Arno


On 5/23/10 10:38 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> sounds like there might be another worthy project here -- cleaning up
>> tool-generated code to make it look man-made so as to avoid detection by
>> over-reaching, hyper-controlling corporations.
>
> Is it sensible to discuss on a public mailing list how to
> intentionally mislead one's contract partner? On the contrary, if one
> wants to show that Apple's fears are unfounded, shouldn't one be
> perfectly open about the technology used for a produce a well working
> and behaving iPhone app? (Like XMLVM is with Xokoban, for instance.)
>
> Also, please spare us the paranoid "evil corporation" stuff. Remember,
> nobody is forcing you to agree with Apple's terms. There are other
> equally over-reaching hyper-controlling corporations that have
> competing mobile device application markets with less restrictive
> terms.
>
> --tml
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users