Re: [xmlvm-users] LGPL / status from Apple?

[Arno P. <ar...@pu...>]

I have been constantly reminding the "Apple guy" whose message I 
forwarded to this list a while ago. He never came back with a 
clarification. I think he went way out of his way of writing that 
message in the first place. Because of the fact that Apple in general 
isn't more specific (apart from some very top-level emails where people 
claim they originate from Steve Jobs himself) I come to the conclusion 
that Apple is exercising FUD. I'm not with Apple; I cannot tell you 
their intentions. If you fall for the FUD, then don't use XMLVM.

Arno


On 5/21/10 2:07 AM, Mark Wolfskehl wrote:
> I agree that the LGPL is the more appropriate license for XMLVM in its current state of development.
>
> Has there been any additional feedback from Apple as to whether they consider XMLVM to be acceptable in terms of their new iPhone SDK licensing agreement and for posting in the app store?
>
> Mark
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users