From: Arno P. <ar...@pu...> - 2010-05-20 22:41:16
|
Apple is free to write whatever they want in their license agreement. It is a whole different question whether their license agreement complies with various national laws. There are some stories that Apple may face some antitrust inquiry in the US: http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/05/03/1952258/Apple-May-Face-Antitrust-Inquiry?art_pos=28 What Apple is doing right now is to create FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt). There is little point to debate what they mean by "originally written in Objective-C". I refuse to even speculate what they might mean by that, because I don't want to succumb to FUD. At this point I am not aware that Apple has rejected any application written with the help of XMLVM. Our own showcase application Xokoban is certainly still in the AppStore: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/xokoban/id322302746?mt=8 Arno On 5/20/10 5:43 PM, Erol Fox wrote: > The recent change to section 3.3.1 looks directly targeted at projects > like this. > > Will XMLVM apps make it through the app store? Is constant appstore > compliance a commitment of the project? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users |