Re: [xmlvm-users] Monster patches and GPL linking exception

[Wolfgang K. <wol...@xm...>]

I think I have to correct a little bit. Actually we did not ask for a  
particular functionality. In fact we asked for some corrections/ 
rewritings after reviewing patches. Some of that was necessary due to  
the integration of other patches. And that boils down to the problem  
of concurrent patches, which is being discussed.

-- Wolfgang

Sent from my iPhone

On 18.03.2010, at 17:49, Panayotis Katsaloulis  
<pan...@pa...> wrote:

>
> On 18 Μαρ 2010, at 6:15 ΜΜ, Dr. Alexander K. Seewald wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Currently it works like that: Wolfgang, Arno or Sascha ask me about
>> a specific functionality (currently it's audio recording), and I
>
> ....
> right, that's the key point:
> they "asked" you :)
>
>
> I know that it really is difficult to handle, but (as I said in
> previous posts), it is expected for a new project to have patches like
> these.
>
> Of course if such patch is not desirable, I could take it back and
> send, for example, only UIViewContoller, then tomorrow another object,
> and so forth :)
> But I believe the total effort then will be much much larger than now,
> since this whole patch has a common logic which at the end of the day
> will make evaluating it easier than to send one file at a time.
> Maybe it might seem too difficult, but it would be easier than to
> "divide and conquer" :)
>
>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users