From: Dr. A. K. S. <al...@se...> - 2010-03-18 16:15:30
|
Hi, I've also submitted "monster" patches in the past. The problem is that XMLVM is evolving so fast that it is a major effort to resync the patches, and in some cases it is not possible (e.g. the old way to localize strings is not compatible with the new way, I had to reimplement it basically from scratch). So I don't think it makes sense to submit monster patches anymore, but rather self-contained parts with significant functionality. Currently it works like that: Wolfgang, Arno or Sascha ask me about a specific functionality (currently it's audio recording), and I resync that part of my code with SVN head, polish it, beat out the memory management bugs and submit it. IMHO that is a better way to go than monster patches because it allows the XMLVM team to pace the development and do the things in the right order as they make sense. A lot of ways to fix things are ad-hoc and not really useful for anyone else (e.g. the way I've implemented ProgressDialog.. :->>) I personally won't go away for a long time from my r953-synchronized private patch set which allows me to cross-compile my app with a minimum of hassle... which is what XMLVM is about for me. Best, Alex -- Dr. Alexander K. Seewald Seewald Solutions www.seewald.at Tel. +43(664)1106886 Fax. +43(1)2533033/2764 |