From: Sascha H. <sa...@xm...> - 2010-03-06 10:43:35
|
Hi Tor, as Wolfgang said, the fireworks demo has no XMLVM specific optimizations. It's actually quite the opposite: We use this demo to check the performance of XMLVM and show that XMLVM is fast enough for applications like this. // Sascha On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Tor Lillqvist <tm...@ik...> wrote: > > I think that it is possible to use parts of Harmony, where it does not > use > > native calls. > > Well, native calls as such are not a problem, as I showed, with a > small patch to the xsl file they translate nicely to calls to external > C (or Objective-C) functions. So native calls actually can make it > less tedious to implement some class for Java->ObjC, as parts of it > can be kept in Java, and just a minimal part needs to be in C/ObjC. > > > And it is still not clear how well the cross-compiled code will perform, > > or it will be too slow for any serious use. > > True. My initial impression from looking at the Fireworks demo was > very positive, it is speedy enough, but of course that is just a demo > written specifically for xmlvm, isn't it? > > --tml > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > xmlvm-users mailing list > xml...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users > |