Re: [xmlvm-users] Starting java->objc and a few initial questions

[Sascha H. <sa...@xm...>]

Hi Tor,

as Wolfgang said, the fireworks demo has no XMLVM specific optimizations.
It's actually quite the opposite: We use this demo to check the performance
of XMLVM and show that XMLVM is fast enough for applications like this.

// Sascha

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Tor Lillqvist <tm...@ik...> wrote:

> > I think that it is possible to use parts of Harmony, where it does not
> use
> > native calls.
>
> Well, native calls as such are not a problem, as I showed, with a
> small patch to the xsl file they translate nicely to calls to external
> C (or Objective-C) functions. So native calls actually can make it
> less tedious to implement some class for Java->ObjC, as parts of it
> can be kept in Java, and just a minimal part needs to be in C/ObjC.
>
> > And it is still not clear how well the cross-compiled code will perform,
> > or it will be too slow for any serious use.
>
> True. My initial impression from looking at the Fireworks demo was
> very positive, it is speedy enough, but of course that is just a demo
> written specifically for xmlvm, isn't it?
>
> --tml
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>