Re: [xmlvm-users] Starting java->objc and a few initial questions

[Wolfgang K. <wol...@xm...>]

The fireworks demo was not written specifically for xmlvm. We already
used that demo (without colored stars and without accelerometer support
of course) in another project. In particular I want to make clear that
we did not implement anything specific to improve performance of the
cross-compiled application.

-- Wolfgang


Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> I think that it is possible to use parts of Harmony, where it does not use
>> native calls.
>>     
>
> Well, native calls as such are not a problem, as I showed, with a
> small patch to the xsl file they translate nicely to calls to external
> C (or Objective-C) functions. So native calls actually can make it
> less tedious to implement some class for Java->ObjC, as parts of it
> can be kept in Java, and just a minimal part needs to be in C/ObjC.
>
>   
>> And it is still not clear how well the cross-compiled code will perform,
>> or it will be too slow for any serious use.
>>     
>
> True. My initial impression from looking at the Fireworks demo was
> very positive, it is speedy enough, but of course that is just a demo
> written specifically for xmlvm, isn't it?
>
> --tml
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>