Re: [xmlvm-users] Commercial usage

[Björn C. <bj...@ca...>]

I have been searching for a answer to the question of the generated code 
and found this link.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOutput

/Björn
Inderjeet Singh skrev:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Markus Heberling <ma...@ti... 
> <mailto:ma...@ti...>> wrote:
>
>     I would understand it in this way:
>
>     The resulting Obj/C source (the *.m and *.h files) is always under
>     GPL. The original java code can remain under any license you want,
>     as long as you don't link to xmlvm files in there (import
>     org.xmlvm.iphone.*).
>
>
> This seems strange. GPL project typically dont force the output to be 
> under GPL. Can you even enforce it via your license?
> What prevents anyone from forking XMLVM as another GPL project, but 
> generate output to be non-GPL? 
>
> It seems to me that only thing that is part of the output binary file 
> and can be forced to be under GPL is the compatibility library.
>
> Thanks
> Inder
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users
>