Re: [xmlvm-users] Commercial usage

[Arno P. <ar...@pu...>]

a license only defines terms and conditions. It is our prerogative where 
this license is being applied to.

Arno


Inderjeet Singh wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Markus Heberling <ma...@ti... 
> <mailto:ma...@ti...>> wrote:
> 
>     I would understand it in this way:
> 
>     The resulting Obj/C source (the *.m and *.h files) is always under
>     GPL. The original java code can remain under any license you want,
>     as long as you don't link to xmlvm files in there (import
>     org.xmlvm.iphone.*).
> 
> 
> This seems strange. GPL project typically dont force the output to be 
> under GPL. Can you even enforce it via your license?
> What prevents anyone from forking XMLVM as another GPL project, but 
> generate output to be non-GPL? 
> 
> It seems to me that only thing that is part of the output binary file 
> and can be forced to be under GPL is the compatibility library.
> 
> Thanks
> Inder
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xmlvm-users mailing list
> xml...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xmlvm-users