From: Robert E. <rm...@ya...> - 2007-09-24 14:14:36
|
--- Christian Vandendorpe <sp...@zo...> wrote: > Mattias Holmlund wrote: > > I have now received reports that a number of these grabbers are > > actually in active use, and some of the grabbers have even been > > fixed so they validate correctly. Very good. > > > > However, noone has said that they are using the following grabbers: > > > > tv_grab_br > > tv_grab_is > > > > I will disable them from the Makefile. If someone speaks up and > > fixes them, we can always resurrect them. > > Why remove them? Because they are not working (per the nightly validation) and no one appears willing to fix them. > Not everybody using xmltv reads this list. If you're maintaining a grabber, you should follow the list. If someone reports a issue, that person should respond to it. If a grabber isn't supported by anyone, it should be removed. > Removing something without checking first if they work or not is not > very nice. We are checking first... that's why the message was posted! > You basically invented that (silly) validation stuff and now you > decide unilaterally to remove grabbers that dont conform to it. That > doesn't sound right. It's not silly.. It's called QA. If a grabber is working but not reporting properly, that can be worked out. (and has been.. dtv_la for example). If a maintainer isn't speaking up, that grabber is abandoned and doesn't need to be around.. *especially* if it fails QA. If you're willing to support those grabbers, feel free to take over support and "save" them. Think of it from the point of view of a new user... they download XMLTV, try the scraper and it doesn't work, they post for support, no response. It turns out it's been broken for over a year. Not good. Robert ____________________________________________________________________________________ Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ |