[xmlhammer-dev] [ xmlhammer-Bugs-1867771 ] Confusing "Validate using internal DTD" terminology
Brought to you by:
edankert
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-01-14 21:26:01
|
Bugs item #1867771, was opened at 2008-01-09 16:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by edankert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=763631&aid=1867771&group_id=145971 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: User Interface Group: rc-2 Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Private: No Submitted By: Edwin Dankert (edankert) Assigned to: Edwin Dankert (edankert) Summary: Confusing "Validate using internal DTD" terminology Initial Comment: Remove all terminology describing the validation method to be using an 'internal' DTD. The term "Validate using internal DTD" was used to describe that the DTD was referenced from within the document using a DOCTYPE, instead of by being referenced by the tool externally to the document. However since the W3C XML spec describes both internal and external DTD subsets, this is very confusing. Instead the following validation options are probably less confusing: [1] Checking wellformed-ness, [2] Validate using DTD (internal + external subsets), [3] Validate using xsi:schemaLocation attribute hints, [4] Validate using specified Schema(s) (ignoring hints), [5] Validate using DTD and specified Schema(s), ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Edwin Dankert (edankert) Date: 2008-01-14 21:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=452928 Originator: YES Changed all textual information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=763631&aid=1867771&group_id=145971 |