Re: [Xmlastro-discussion] It's about time.

[Peter C. C. <pc...@ec...>]

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Don Willems wrote:

> Now that I understand your reasons for including the local times better,
> I'm not so sure anymore if we should include geographical data (in the
> time element). As long as we provide a 'non-local' time. Anyway as I
> said before, I think that these different time formats (local and
> not-local) should be in different elements as they are semantically
> different.

I can see what you are saying about that. It is definitely true that local
and non-local times would be used in different contexts so having them in
the same element probably does not make sense. Let me rethink my approach
a bit and report back with an updated proposal in a few days.

Peter