RE: [Xmlastro-discussion] Multiple Objects

[Peter C. C. <pc...@ec...>]

On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Peter Dean wrote:

> Perhaps I'm missing the point but whats wrong with simply having:
>
> <object> and <objects>
>
> The former being singular and the latter, well, plural.

My only concern about <objects> is that it looks a lot like <object>. It
might make the documents harder to read than otherwise. That's a minor
issue, though.

I think Don should go ahead and include <objects> or <object-group> or
something along those lines into the schema. Regardless of what we call
it, it seems clear that we need a way to occassionally support multiple
objects in a single observation.

Peter