|
From: Don W. <don...@ma...> - 2003-04-01 22:19:16
|
> I suggest we avoid the name "object-set" though. It sounds like > observation-set, yet it works quite differently. Also if one quickly > scans > a document the different <ob.*-set> elements start looking pretty much > the > same. I noticed that when looking at some of the examples you and Tom > posted. Perhaps <object-group> or <object-list> would be better? I'd prefer the <object-group> element. My feeling is that <object-list>, could contain a list of unrelated objects. The idea is that the objects in the list are related (in position) because you are observing them together. Don |