On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Patrick Hartling wrote:
> Doug McCorkle wrote:
>> Hello,
>> In gmtl and CppDOM it appears that they both utilize a variant
>> of SConsAddons. If that is true would it be possible to have both the
>> packages use SConsAddons rather than having their own variant of the
>> utility? Thanks.
>
> The GMTL build does not use SConsAddons. I believe that parts of
> its build
> were used as the foundation for SConsAddons, however.
>
Ahh. I thought it was the other way around. Is there any desire to
move it to SConsAddons?
> The CppDOM trunk now gets the current version of SConsAddons as an SVN
> external reference. The CppDOM 0.6 branch, OTOH, has an old version of
> SConsAddons and most likely does not build with the latest version.
>
I did not know this. Thanks for the update.
Doug
|
