Re: [xml-cppdom-devel] SConstruct patch

[Patrick H. <pa...@13...>]

Doug McCorkle wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Doug McCorkle wrote:
>=20
>> On Jun 28, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Patrick Hartling wrote:
>>
>>> Doug McCorkle wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>      Attached is a patch that changes the SConstruct to encode the
>>>> relative flagpoll variable in the fpc file rather than utilize the
>>>> absolute path for prefix.
>>> With this patch, headers end up getting installed into /include/=20
>>> cppdom-0.7.8
>>> instead of <prefix>/include/cppdom-0.7.8. I think that
>>> base_inst_paths['include'] plays a more important role than just =20
>>> influencing
>>> what ends up in the generated .fpc file.
>> Thanks for catching the mistake. Attached is a revised patch. I =20
>> also cleaned up some other aspects of the previous patch.
>>
>=20
> I was just wondering if this patch is ok or if there are also =20
> problems with this implementation?

It was fine. I committed it a week ago.

 -Patrick


--=20
Patrick L. Hartling
VP Engineering, Infiscape Corp.
http://www.infiscape.com/