Re: [xml-cppdom-devel] Patch to correct windows build

[Doug M. <mc...@ia...>]

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hartling <
pat...@gm...> wrote:

> On Apr 4, 2011, at 7:09 PM, Doug McCorkle wrote:
>
> > On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Patrick Hartling wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 31, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Doug McCorkle wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I have attached two patches that correct the usage of scons on windows
> and I added a missing header.
> >>
> >> What is the minimum required version of SCons after applying the build
> changes? I haven't been keeping up with SCons API changes/deprecations.
> >
> > I changed it to 2.0 in the SConstruct. I took the liberty of doing this
> since I am not sure why anyone would really want to run something older than
> the latest stable release of SCons.
>
> I see your point. I am just a little hesitant because there will probably
> be at least a few people who can't easily update to SCons 2.0. That said, if
> people do complain about this, we have the option of distributing and using
> a local SCons within the CppDOM build, right?
>
> I do not really follow your question. I understand your hesitation though.

Doug