From: Patrick H. <pat...@gm...> - 2011-04-06 15:14:04
|
On Apr 4, 2011, at 7:09 PM, Doug McCorkle wrote: > On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Patrick Hartling wrote: > >> On Mar 31, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Doug McCorkle wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have attached two patches that correct the usage of scons on windows and I added a missing header. >> >> What is the minimum required version of SCons after applying the build changes? I haven't been keeping up with SCons API changes/deprecations. > > I changed it to 2.0 in the SConstruct. I took the liberty of doing this since I am not sure why anyone would really want to run something older than the latest stable release of SCons. I see your point. I am just a little hesitant because there will probably be at least a few people who can't easily update to SCons 2.0. That said, if people do complain about this, we have the option of distributing and using a local SCons within the CppDOM build, right? -Patrick -- Patrick L. Hartling Senior Software Engineer, Priority 5 http://www.priority5.com/ |