You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(245) |
Nov
(321) |
Dec
(102) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(133) |
Feb
(365) |
Mar
(265) |
Apr
(152) |
May
(127) |
Jun
(205) |
Jul
(515) |
Aug
(449) |
Sep
(485) |
Oct
(553) |
Nov
(740) |
Dec
(640) |
2005 |
Jan
(1277) |
Feb
(1154) |
Mar
(1282) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: woody <ma...@us...> - 2005-03-25 23:21:45
|
I have this as well, it is consistent in that it fails on 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 unstable builds. woody =========================== Christopher S. Aker wrote: >>>Using stable (2.05) tools and kernel, dom0 is CentOS 4. >>> >>># xm sysrq mydomain s >>>Error: Internal Server Error >>> >>> >>Does this happen every time, or only after xend has got in a bad state? >> >> > >Every time -- everything else is working great. > >-Chris > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Xen-devel mailing list >Xen...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel > > > -- Sincerely, Woody Marvel LTC Open Source Projects Beaverton, OR tel: 503-578-3833/775-3833 email: ma...@us... ======================================================================= "The branch is not only ever near the stem, but ever receiving life and fruitfulness from it." -- C.H.Spurgeon ======================================================================= |
From: Magenheimer, D. (HP L. F. Collins) <dan...@hp...> - 2005-03-25 22:59:09
|
This updates Xen/ia64 to use the Rusty Russell memory allocator (thanks Kevin and Arun!), adds a couple more baby steps towards supporting multiple domains, and catches up with various core changes so Xen/ia64 will compile again. Please pull: bk://xen-ia64.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable-ia64.bk Thanks! Dan |
From: Jimi X. <ji...@wa...> - 2005-03-25 22:34:23
|
x86 seems to get the protoype thru #include <asm/debugger.h> but domain.c should explicitly #include <xen/softirq.h> -JX ===== xen/common/domain.c 1.172 vs 1.171 ===== --- 1.172/xen/common/domain.c 2005-03-25 17:02:52 -05:00 +++ 1.171/xen/common/domain.c 2005-03-25 09:00:59 -05:00 @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ #include <xen/event.h> #include <xen/time.h> #include <xen/console.h> -#include <xen/softirq.h> #include <asm/shadow.h> #include <public/dom0_ops.h> #include <asm/domain_page.h> |
From: Xen U. <xe...@th...> - 2005-03-25 21:48:23
|
Steven Hand wrote: >>Hi list members, >> >>Does anyone have any idea what may be wrong or where I should look next? > > > Looks like you're falling back to PIO mode under Xen. > > Have you compiled in support for your IDE chipset? > > cheers, > Steven, you hit the nail on the head. It took quite a while to recompile in its brain-damaged state but in this case the physician really did heal itself! And, yes, Ian, the performance is now, indeed, on par with the unxenifed kernel. I have only 1G so I will have to apportion it carefully; I'll keep your advice in mind, Nivedita. Now the real fun starts :) Thanks to all, Mike Wright |
From: Tupshin H. <tu...@tu...> - 2005-03-25 21:47:58
|
Anthony Liguori wrote: > Tupshin Harper wrote: > >> 5) use your distro's procedure to bootstrap into a chroot environment >> (if it has one) such as debian's debootstrap or by using gentoo's >> stage3 installation approach. (none for RedHat9 that I'm aware of) > > > Here are the mechanisms I know and their requirements. I plan to put > this in the Wiki as soon as it goes live (if it's not already there): > > Gentoo <snip> I have done something very equivalent to your gentoo procedure, but when I try to emerge glibc (or as a dependency for many other things) I'm getting a segfault near the end of the process. I'm guessing this is the nptl problem, and so far I haven't been able to work around it. FWIW, this is with xen unstable as of about 1 week ago. -Tupshin |
From: Keir F. <Kei...@cl...> - 2005-03-25 21:43:17
|
On 25 Mar 2005, at 21:23, Ian Pratt wrote: > It didn't apply totally cleanly, but I fixed it up, and it booted OK > for > me. > > How much testing have you been able to give the patch? > > I'm not sure that some of the #if 0's are actually going to help from a > maintenance POV, so it might actually be better to remove any whole > functions etc that aren't used. I'd make it a pre-condition of acceptance: the patch will be much smaller since a lot of the added code fragments are actually if 0'ed out. It makes it hard to work out what moving parts have actually changed. -- Keir |
From: Keir F. <Kei...@cl...> - 2005-03-25 21:40:23
|
I expect we can fix that up in the ppc macros: if the atomic access is sub-32-bit aligned then round the address down to 32-bit boundary and do a 32-bit cmpxchg. -- Keir On 25 Mar 2005, at 21:25, Jimi Xenidis wrote: > > In PPC land we have an issue where cmpxchg operations can only be > applied to strictly aligned 32 and 64 bit quantities. > > We understand on x86 the use of the packed attribute has certain > benefits, but in the common areas we believe that portability should > be the primary concern in the common code. > > I can only assume that much debate will come from this as we find > alignment and size issues all over. > > The particular offender at the moment is: > include/public/grant_table.h flags 76 u16 flags; > > It is used with atomic methods such as cmpxchg_user() and clear_bit(). > > Any thoughts on how to proceed with this would be appreciated. > > -JX > > BTW: is clear_bit() as implemeted for x86 have soem alignment issues? > My expertise in this space is limited. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real > users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel |
From: Anthony L. <ali...@us...> - 2005-03-25 21:37:52
|
Tupshin Harper wrote: > 5) use your distro's procedure to bootstrap into a chroot environment > (if it has one) such as debian's debootstrap or by using gentoo's > stage3 installation approach. (none for RedHat9 that I'm aware of) Here are the mechanisms I know and their requirements. I plan to put this in the Wiki as soon as it goes live (if it's not already there): Gentoo ------------- Requirements: wget Note: See http://www.gentoo.org for additional mirrors ]# MIRROR=http://mirror.usu.edu/mirrors/gentoo ]# VERSION=2004.3 ]# wget ${MIRROR}/releases/x86/2004.3/stages/i686/stage3-i686-${VERSION}.tar.bz2 ]# tar xfj stage3-i686-${VERSION}.tar.bz2 ]# mount -obind /dev dev ]# mount -obind /proc proc ]# chroot . ]# env-update ]# source /etc/profile ]# emerge sync && emerge portage Debian ------------ Requirements: debootstrap (http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/debootstrap) and perhaps apt ]# TARGET=sid ]# debootstrap ${TARGET} . Fedora ------------ Requirements: yum (Don't know how to install this on non-Fedora systems) ]# yum --installroot=. -y groupinstall Base SuSE --------- Does anyone know a distro-neutral way to install a SuSE root? Regards, Anthony Liguori > -Tupshin > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel > |
From: Ronald G. M. <rmi...@la...> - 2005-03-25 21:31:04
|
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Jimi Xenidis wrote: > We understand on x86 the use of the packed attribute has certain > benefits, but in the common areas we believe that portability should > be the primary concern in the common code. I would actually like to see packed go away forever, as it is a headache for me each time I deal with changes. Plan 9 compilers don't like this type of thing. ron |
From: Jimi X. <ji...@wa...> - 2005-03-25 21:25:29
|
In PPC land we have an issue where cmpxchg operations can only be applied to strictly aligned 32 and 64 bit quantities. We understand on x86 the use of the packed attribute has certain benefits, but in the common areas we believe that portability should be the primary concern in the common code. I can only assume that much debate will come from this as we find alignment and size issues all over. The particular offender at the moment is: include/public/grant_table.h flags 76 u16 flags; It is used with atomic methods such as cmpxchg_user() and clear_bit(). Any thoughts on how to proceed with this would be appreciated. -JX BTW: is clear_bit() as implemeted for x86 have soem alignment issues? My expertise in this space is limited. |
From: Nivedita S. <ni...@us...> - 2005-03-25 21:24:05
|
Xen User wrote: > 2.6.10-xen0 boots with no errors, but the mouse seems jerky and slow to > respond but is functional. > > Networking is up and functional. > > The drives are IDE in a raid0 using lvm. The m/b is typical budget x86 > with 1GB ram and 1GHz Athlon. It has been in various uses without > failure for a couple years. This may be irrelevant, but how much of the memory are you allocating to dom0 in your configuration? I had similar symptoms when running under 64MB. Increasing the amount of memory in my system (I happen to have 256MB for dom0 now) eliminated all of the jerky and slow behaviour. Others have reported no problems, however, when running in low mem conditions. thanks, Nivedita |
From: Ian P. <m+I...@cl...> - 2005-03-25 21:23:36
|
Natasha, It didn't apply totally cleanly, but I fixed it up, and it booted OK for me. How much testing have you been able to give the patch? I'm not sure that some of the #if 0's are actually going to help from a maintenance POV, so it might actually be better to remove any whole functions etc that aren't used. Please can you resend with a signed-off-by line, and as a single patch.=20 Thanks, Ian > -----Original Message----- > From: xen...@li...=20 > [mailto:xen...@li...] On Behalf Of=20 > Natasha Jarymowycz > Sent: 24 March 2005 13:57 > To: xen...@li... > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]local apic initialization >=20 > I forgot the signed-off-by line on that previous email. if there > are no major objections to the patch itself I will resend. sorry > about that. >=20 > Natasha >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by Microsoft Mobile & Embedded=20 > DevCon 2005 > Attend MEDC 2005 May 9-12 in Vegas. Learn more about the=20 > latest Windows > Embedded(r) & Windows Mobile(tm) platforms, applications &=20 > content. Register > by 3/29 & save $300=20 > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6883&alloc_id=3D15149&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel >=20 |
From: Tupshin H. <tu...@tu...> - 2005-03-25 20:57:43
|
Brian Hays wrote: >Hello, > >What is the best way to create guest (domU) filesystems? I am >currently running the latest version on Xen on FC3 and would like to >create a Redhat 9 and Fedora Core 1 filesystem for use on domU's. What >is the best way to accomplish this, and also ... will Redhat 9 boot on >the 2.6.11 kernel (I'm using the xen & kernel-xen0 & U rpms from the >FC4test1 repository ... it only comes with 2.6 kernels)? If not how >can I add another xenU kernel (2.4 version)? > >Thank you, >Brian > > Possible strategies for fresh domU installation that I'm aware of: 1) install to bare hardware, and then copy the filesystem to a place where xen can load it 2) install into vmware and then do the same 3) qemu probably works as well...I haven't tried it 4) find a disk image/tarred archive of an installed base system, and extract it to a xen accessible partition 4a) find a disk image of an earlier version and use apt/yum/emerge/etc to update it after installing (note that uml and colinux are two projects that have pre-existing disk images of some popular distros) 5) use your distro's procedure to bootstrap into a chroot environment (if it has one) such as debian's debootstrap or by using gentoo's stage3 installation approach. (none for RedHat9 that I'm aware of) -Tupshin |
From: Christopher S. A. <ca...@th...> - 2005-03-25 20:48:10
|
> What is the best way to create guest (domU) filesystems? I am > currently running the latest version on Xen on FC3 and would like to > create a Redhat 9 and Fedora Core 1 filesystem for use on domU's. What > is the best way to accomplish this, and also ... will Redhat 9 boot on > the 2.6.11 kernel (I'm using the xen & kernel-xen0 & U rpms from the > FC4test1 repository ... it only comes with 2.6 kernels)? If not how > can I add another xenU kernel (2.4 version)? There are a number of filesystems available from the UML world. It's fairly easy to (loop) mount them, make the changes to fstab, and then copy the entire tree into where ever you run your domUs from... http://uml.linode.com (u-m-l.sf.net mirror, a few oldies but goodies) http://uml.linode.com/root_fs.rh-9-full.pristine.20030724.bz2 ftp://ftp.express.org/pub/uml/fedora-core1-server-uml20040129.tar.bz2 Red Hat 9 will boot on a 2.6 kernel, just watch out for the /lib/tls issue. -Chris |
From: Jerone Y. <jy...@us...> - 2005-03-25 20:42:30
|
I was walking through the code and noticed that the macro around an error check that was not correctly defined...it was "_i386__", should be "__i386__". -- Jerone Young IBM Linux Technology Center jy...@us... 512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157) |
From: Robin G. <gr...@pr...> - 2005-03-25 20:40:07
|
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Brian Hays wrote: > Hello, > > What is the best way to create guest (domU) filesystems? Use LVM. File-backed filesystems are slower and may not be as reliable. > will Redhat 9 boot on > the 2.6.11 kernel It should do. However, you will need to install a recent version of module-init-tools if you want to use kernel modules at all. -- Robin |
From: Jerone Y. <jy...@us...> - 2005-03-25 20:34:33
|
That can easily be fixed when put in the tree. The main point is to exit with a non zero value. True by exiting with -1 can't get the negative exit code from the shell (you would get 255). But still bahaviors the same way if $? != 0 then we know something is wrong. On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 14:21 -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Jerone Young wrote: > > > > > +all: check > > > + @for subdir in $(SUBDIRS); do \ > > > + $(MAKE) -C $$subdir $@ || exit -1; \ > > > + done > > > > How is this a valid makefile? Where's the tab? > > Please use "@set -e; for ...", and remove the "|| exit -1". > > Besides, exit -1 is poor, it s/b a positive number. It's not really possible > to exit with a negative value. > -- Jerone Young IBM Linux Technology Center jy...@us... 512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157) |
From: Brian H. <bri...@gm...> - 2005-03-25 20:32:20
|
Hello, What is the best way to create guest (domU) filesystems? I am currently running the latest version on Xen on FC3 and would like to create a Redhat 9 and Fedora Core 1 filesystem for use on domU's. What is the best way to accomplish this, and also ... will Redhat 9 boot on the 2.6.11 kernel (I'm using the xen & kernel-xen0 & U rpms from the FC4test1 repository ... it only comes with 2.6 kernels)? If not how can I add another xenU kernel (2.4 version)? Thank you, Brian |
From: Adam H. <do...@br...> - 2005-03-25 20:21:26
|
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Adam Heath wrote: > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Jerone Young wrote: > > > +all: check > > + @for subdir in $(SUBDIRS); do \ > > + $(MAKE) -C $$subdir $@ || exit -1; \ > > + done > > How is this a valid makefile? Where's the tab? Please use "@set -e; for ...", and remove the "|| exit -1". Besides, exit -1 is poor, it s/b a positive number. It's not really possible to exit with a negative value. |
From: Ian P. <m+I...@cl...> - 2005-03-25 20:05:40
|
> My understanding is that in a stand-alone (no vms running)=20 > situation the=20 > performance difference between a standard kernel and a xen enabled=20 > kernel should be roughly the same. Is this correct? Yes. Xen is clearly very unhappy on your system.=20 Are you sure the correct ide driver is compiled into the kernel and is being used? Compare the boot messages between native and booting the xen kernel.=20 Ian =20 > 2.6.10-xen0 boots with no errors, but the mouse seems jerky=20 > and slow to=20 > respond but is functional. >=20 > Networking is up and functional. >=20 > The drives are IDE in a raid0 using lvm. The m/b is typical=20 > budget x86=20 > with 1GB ram and 1GHz Athlon. It has been in various uses without=20 > failure for a couple years. >=20 > As a test I created a logical volume "Main/test" of 1G rw and=20 > formatted=20 > it with ext3. The inode creation part took perhaps 1 second but the=20 > journal creation took over 1 minute. I was able to have=20 > lunch (and do=20 > the dishes) in the time it took to format 18G. >=20 > Reboot into 2.6.9 non-xen and try the same experiment and the entire=20 > process takes less than 2 seconds. >=20 > I looked in /proc/interrupts but nothing there seems awry, i.e. no=20 > runaway counts. >=20 > Does anyone have any idea what may be wrong or where I should=20 > look next? >=20 > Thanks for any help, > Mike Wright >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from=20 > real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel >=20 |
From: Christopher S. A. <ca...@th...> - 2005-03-25 19:55:21
|
> > Using stable (2.05) tools and kernel, dom0 is CentOS 4. > > > > # xm sysrq mydomain s > > Error: Internal Server Error > > Does this happen every time, or only after xend has got in a bad state? Every time -- everything else is working great. -Chris |
From: Ian P. <m+I...@cl...> - 2005-03-25 19:34:42
|
> Using stable (2.05) tools and kernel, dom0 is CentOS 4. >=20 > # xm sysrq mydomain s > Error: Internal Server Error Does this happen every time, or only after xend has got in a bad state? Ian |
From: Adam H. <do...@br...> - 2005-03-25 19:12:59
|
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Jerone Young wrote: > > >That's odd the file I did the diff from has the tabs just fine. Hmmm, > >I'll redo it. > > > A lot of mail clients translate tabs into spaces when inlining patches. > In general, it's better to attach patches (keeping a plain-text mime > type of course) if you have such a mail client. Any such mail client is broken. For the record, I use pine, and it doesn't have these problems. |
From: Matt C. <co...@bn...> - 2005-03-25 19:12:02
|
On 2005-03-18 at 21:06 Wim, Coekaerts wrote: > I got same as Rik on an ibm x440 6cpu HT ... >On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:27:00AM -0000, Ian Pratt wrote: >> Works for me on an SMP Pentium 4 Xeon with HT -- see attached boot log. ... >>> -----Original Message----- ... >>> [mailto:xen-devel-admin@li...] On Behalf Of Rik van Riel ... >>> Subject: [Xen-devel] BUG: xen-unstable boot stuck after mtrr >>> >>> Current xen-unstable bootup on a P4 doesn"t get as far as >>> to start up domain 0, on my test systems. The last line >>> it prints out is: >>> >>> (XEN) mtrr: v2.0 (20020519) I have had the same issue on both a dell pe2650 and pe2850 2cpu w/ ht running the fedora devel packages (xen-2-20050308,kernel-xen{0,U}-devel-2.6.11-1.1177_FC4); boot log appended at end. It comes up fine if I give xen a "nosmp" from grub ... kernel /boot/xen.gz dom0_mem=512000 nosmp watchdog console=com1 com1=9600,8n1 ... but that sucks. I haven't experienced any hangs or other instability so far. I do have a perc4 embedded raid controller, which michal urbanski thinks he's having trouble with in his pe2850: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6884811&forum_id=35600 The system runs beautifully when I boot regular, non-xen fc3 aswell. -matt here's the grub entry used ---------------------------------------------------------------------- root (hd0,1) kernel /boot/xen.gz dom0_mem=512000 watchdog com1=9600,8n1 module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1177_FC4xen0 ro root=LABEL=/ console=ttyS0 module /boot/initrd-2.6.11-1.1177_FC4xen0.img this grub entry boots successfully, but of couse just w/ 1cpu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- root (hd0,1) kernel /boot/xen.gz dom0_mem=512000 nosmp watchdog com1=9600,8n1 module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11-1.1177_FC4xen0 ro root=LABEL=/ console=ttyS0 module /boot/initrd-2.6.11-1.1177_FC4xen0.img ---------------------------------------------------------------------- here's the log where it hangs at mtrr (note: there's some previous screen garbage interspersed at the beginning due to the serial console setup). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- \ \/ /___ _ __ |___ / / _ \ __| | _____ _____| | \ // _ \ '_ \ |_ \| | | |__ / _` |/ _ \ \ / / _ \ | / \ __/ | | | ___) | |_| |__| (_| | __/\ V / __/ | /_/\_\___|_| |_| |____(_)___/ \__,_|\___| \_/ \___|_| http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/netos/xen e e ! University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory "stock o h f a s l Xen version 3.0-devel (bhc...@bu...) (gcc version 4.0.0 20050302 (Red Hat 4.0.5 Latest ChangeSet: information unavailablenel] [F5-Rescue] boo (XEN) WARNING: Only the first 4GB of the physical memory map can be accessed (XEN) by Xen in 32-bit mode. Truncating the memory map... (XEN) Physical RAM map: (XEN) 0000000000000000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable) (XEN) 0000000000100000 - 00000000cffc0000 (usable) (XEN) 00000000cffc0000 - 00000000cffcfc00 (ACPI data) (XEN) 00000000cffcfc00 - 00000000cffff000 (reserved) (XEN) 00000000e0000000 - 00000000fec90000 (reserved) (XEN) 00000000fed00000 - 00000000fed00400 (reserved) (XEN) 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee10000 (reserved) (XEN) 00000000ffb00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) (XEN) System RAM: 3327MB (3407232kB) (XEN) Xen heap: 10MB (10644kB) (XEN) CPU0: Before vendor init, caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000, vendor = 0 (XEN) CPU#0: Physical ID: 0, Logical ID: 0 (XEN) CPU caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000 00000000 (XEN) found SMP MP-table at 000fe710 (XEN) ACPI: RSDP (v000 DELL ) @ 0x000fd650 (XEN) ACPI: RSDT (v001 DELL PE BKC 0x00000001 MSFT 0x0100000a) @ 0x000fd664 (XEN) ACPI: FADT (v001 DELL PE BKC 0x00000001 MSFT 0x0100000a) @ 0x000fd6b0 (XEN) ACPI: MADT (v001 DELL PE BKC 0x00000001 MSFT 0x0100000a) @ 0x000fd724 (XEN) ACPI: SPCR (v001 DELL PE BKC 0x00000001 MSFT 0x0100000a) @ 0x000fd7cc (XEN) ACPI: HPET (v001 DELL PE BKC 0x00000001 MSFT 0x0100000a) @ 0x000fd81c (XEN) ACPI: MCFG (v001 DELL PE BKC 0x00000001 MSFT 0x0100000a) @ 0x000fd854 (XEN) ACPI: DSDT (v001 DELL PE BKC 0x00000001 MSFT 0x0100000e) @ 0x00000000 (XEN) ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) (XEN) Processor #0 Unknown CPU [15:4] APIC version 20 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x06] enabled) (XEN) Processor #6 Unknown CPU [15:4] APIC version 20 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x01] enabled) (XEN) Processor #1 Unknown CPU [15:4] APIC version 20 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x07] enabled) (XEN) Processor #7 Unknown CPU [15:4] APIC version 20 (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x01] high edge lint[0x1]) (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x02] high edge lint[0x1]) (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x03] high edge lint[0x1]) (XEN) ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x04] high edge lint[0x1]) (XEN) Using ACPI for processor (LAPIC) configuration information (XEN) Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4 (XEN) Virtual Wire compatibility mode. (XEN) OEM ID: DELL Product ID: PE 016D APIC at: 0xFEE00000 (XEN) I/O APIC #8 Version 32 at 0xFEC00000. (XEN) I/O APIC #9 Version 32 at 0xFEC80000. (XEN) I/O APIC #10 Version 32 at 0xFEC83000. (XEN) I/O APIC #11 Version 32 at 0xFEC84000. (XEN) Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 4 I/O APICs (XEN) Processors: 4 (XEN) Using scheduler: Borrowed Virtual Time (bvt) (XEN) Initializing CPU#0 (XEN) Detected 3591.165 MHz processor. (XEN) CPU0: Before vendor init, caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000, vendor = 0 (XEN) CPU#0: Physical ID: 0, Logical ID: 0 (XEN) CPU caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000 00000000 (XEN) CPU0 booted (XEN) enabled ExtINT on CPU#0 (XEN) ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000 (XEN) ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000 (XEN) Booting processor 1/1 eip 90000 (XEN) Initializing CPU#1 (XEN) masked ExtINT on CPU#1 (XEN) ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000 (XEN) ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000 (XEN) CPU1: Before vendor init, caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000, vendor = 0 (XEN) CPU#1: Physical ID: 0, Logical ID: 1 (XEN) CPU caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000 00000000 (XEN) CPU1 has booted. (XEN) Booting processor 2/6 eip 90000 (XEN) Initializing CPU#2 (XEN) masked ExtINT on CPU#2 (XEN) ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000 (XEN) ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000 (XEN) CPU2: Before vendor init, caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000, vendor = 0 (XEN) CPU#2: Physical ID: 3, Logical ID: 0 (XEN) CPU caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000 00000000 (XEN) CPU2 has booted. (XEN) Booting processor 3/7 eip 90000 (XEN) Initializing CPU#3 (XEN) masked ExtINT on CPU#3 (XEN) ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000 (XEN) ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000 (XEN) CPU3: Before vendor init, caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000, vendor = 0 (XEN) CPU#3: Physical ID: 3, Logical ID: 1 (XEN) CPU caps: bfebfbff 20100000 00000000 00000000 (XEN) CPU3 has booted. (XEN) Total of 4 processors activated. (XEN) ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs (XEN) Setting 8 in the phys_id_present_map (XEN) ...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 8 ... ok. (XEN) Setting 9 in the phys_id_present_map (XEN) ...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 9 ... ok. (XEN) Setting 10 in the phys_id_present_map (XEN) ...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 10 ... ok. (XEN) Setting 11 in the phys_id_present_map (XEN) ...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 11 ... ok. (XEN) init IO_APIC IRQs (XEN) vector_irq[49] = 1 (XEN) vector_irq[51] = 4 (XEN) vector_irq[59] = 6 (XEN) vector_irq[61] = 8 (XEN) vector_irq[69] = 9 (XEN) vector_irq[71] = 12 (XEN) vector_irq[79] = 14 (XEN) vector_irq[81] = 15 (XEN) vector_irq[89] = 16 (XEN) vector_irq[91] = 18 (XEN) vector_irq[99] = 19 (XEN) vector_irq[a1] = 20 (XEN) vector_irq[a9] = 21 (XEN) vector_irq[b1] = 23 (XEN) vector_irq[b9] = 25 (XEN) vector_irq[c1] = 26 (XEN) vector_irq[c9] = 38 (XEN) vector_irq[d1] = 48 (XEN) vector_irq[d9] = 49 (XEN) vector_irq[e1] = 72 (XEN) vector_irq[e9] = 73 (XEN) vector_irq[42] = 74 (XEN) vector_irq[4a] = 75 (XEN) vector_irq[52] = 76 (XEN) vector_irq[5a] = 77 (XEN) vector_irq[62] = 78 (XEN) vector_irq[6a] = 79 (XEN) vector_irq[72] = 80 (XEN) vector_irq[7a] = 81 (XEN) vector_irq[8a] = 82 (XEN) vector_irq[92] = 83 (XEN) ..TIMER: vector=0x41 pin1=2 pin2=0 (XEN) Using local APIC timer interrupts. (XEN) Calibrating APIC timer for CPU0... (XEN) ..... CPU speed is 3591.0153 MHz. (XEN) ..... Bus speed is 199.5008 MHz. (XEN) ..... bus_scale = 0x0000CC4F (XEN) Time init:SC synchronization across CPUs: passed. (XEN) .... System Time: 994014551ns (XEN) .... cpu_freq: 00000000:D60CD5EC (XEN) .... scale: 00000001:1D24EA75 (XEN) .... Wall Clock: 1111757316s 470000us (XEN) Testing NMI watchdog --- CPU#0 okay. CPU#1 okay. CPU#2 okay. CPU#3 okay. (XEN) PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfbf0e, last bus=11 (XEN) PCI: Using configuration type 1 (XEN) PCI: Probing PCI hardware (XEN) PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) (XEN) PCI: Ignoring BAR0-3 of IDE controller 00:1f.1 (XEN) Transparent bridge - PCI device 8086:244e (XEN) PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX/ICH [8086/24d0] at 00:1f.0 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I2,P0) -> 16 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I4,P0) -> 16 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I5,P0) -> 16 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I6,P0) -> 16 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I29,P0) -> 16 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I29,P1) -> 19 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I29,P2) -> 18 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I29,P3) -> 23 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B2,I14,P0) -> 38 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B6,I7,P0) -> 48 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B7,I8,P0) -> 49 (XEN) PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B11,I13,P0) -> 18 (XEN) mtrr: v2.0 (20020519) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
From: Steven H. <Ste...@cl...> - 2005-03-25 19:07:48
|
> Hi list members, > > I have a fresh FC3 with fresh bk clone of xen-2.0.bk. It builds and > installs without complaint. > > "/lib/tls" has been moved to "/lib/tls.disabled". > > My understanding is that in a stand-alone (no vms running) situation the > performance difference between a standard kernel and a xen enabled > kernel should be roughly the same. Is this correct? > > 2.6.10-xen0 boots with no errors, but the mouse seems jerky and slow to > respond but is functional. > > Networking is up and functional. > > The drives are IDE in a raid0 using lvm. The m/b is typical budget x86 > with 1GB ram and 1GHz Athlon. It has been in various uses without > failure for a couple years. > > As a test I created a logical volume "Main/test" of 1G rw and formatted > it with ext3. The inode creation part took perhaps 1 second but the > journal creation took over 1 minute. I was able to have lunch (and do > the dishes) in the time it took to format 18G. > > Reboot into 2.6.9 non-xen and try the same experiment and the entire > process takes less than 2 seconds. > > I looked in /proc/interrupts but nothing there seems awry, i.e. no > runaway counts. > > Does anyone have any idea what may be wrong or where I should look next? Looks like you're falling back to PIO mode under Xen. Have you compiled in support for your IDE chipset? cheers, S. |