Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size.

[David H. <dav...@bl...>]

Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2005, at 17:31, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> 
>>>> Few things to note:
>>>> 1) packed is [un]necessary since the ABI will do the right thing
> 
> I prefer to pack things explicitly rather than rely on ABI padding.

If you use -Wpadded when compiling with gcc then you're not relying on
ABI padding; you're automatically checking that it is not used. That
would seem to be precisely what is required here.

-- 
David Hopwood <dav...@bl...>