From: Ian P. <m+I...@cl...> - 2005-03-25 20:05:40
|
> My understanding is that in a stand-alone (no vms running)=20 > situation the=20 > performance difference between a standard kernel and a xen enabled=20 > kernel should be roughly the same. Is this correct? Yes. Xen is clearly very unhappy on your system.=20 Are you sure the correct ide driver is compiled into the kernel and is being used? Compare the boot messages between native and booting the xen kernel.=20 Ian =20 > 2.6.10-xen0 boots with no errors, but the mouse seems jerky=20 > and slow to=20 > respond but is functional. >=20 > Networking is up and functional. >=20 > The drives are IDE in a raid0 using lvm. The m/b is typical=20 > budget x86=20 > with 1GB ram and 1GHz Athlon. It has been in various uses without=20 > failure for a couple years. >=20 > As a test I created a logical volume "Main/test" of 1G rw and=20 > formatted=20 > it with ext3. The inode creation part took perhaps 1 second but the=20 > journal creation took over 1 minute. I was able to have=20 > lunch (and do=20 > the dishes) in the time it took to format 18G. >=20 > Reboot into 2.6.9 non-xen and try the same experiment and the entire=20 > process takes less than 2 seconds. >=20 > I looked in /proc/interrupts but nothing there seems awry, i.e. no=20 > runaway counts. >=20 > Does anyone have any idea what may be wrong or where I should=20 > look next? >=20 > Thanks for any help, > Mike Wright >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from=20 > real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel >=20 |