From: Steven H. <Ste...@cl...> - 2005-03-25 19:07:48
|
> Hi list members, > > I have a fresh FC3 with fresh bk clone of xen-2.0.bk. It builds and > installs without complaint. > > "/lib/tls" has been moved to "/lib/tls.disabled". > > My understanding is that in a stand-alone (no vms running) situation the > performance difference between a standard kernel and a xen enabled > kernel should be roughly the same. Is this correct? > > 2.6.10-xen0 boots with no errors, but the mouse seems jerky and slow to > respond but is functional. > > Networking is up and functional. > > The drives are IDE in a raid0 using lvm. The m/b is typical budget x86 > with 1GB ram and 1GHz Athlon. It has been in various uses without > failure for a couple years. > > As a test I created a logical volume "Main/test" of 1G rw and formatted > it with ext3. The inode creation part took perhaps 1 second but the > journal creation took over 1 minute. I was able to have lunch (and do > the dishes) in the time it took to format 18G. > > Reboot into 2.6.9 non-xen and try the same experiment and the entire > process takes less than 2 seconds. > > I looked in /proc/interrupts but nothing there seems awry, i.e. no > runaway counts. > > Does anyone have any idea what may be wrong or where I should look next? Looks like you're falling back to PIO mode under Xen. Have you compiled in support for your IDE chipset? cheers, S. |