From: Lissa V. <li...@us...> - 2011-08-18 16:51:13
|
Well we do the same thing when needing to debug xcatd. Although we just usually comment out the two lines to see the information. Only for debug though. It is a good thing while developing or if you have a problem. I would not recommend on a production system. Lissa K. Valletta 2-3/T12 Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 (tie 293) 433-3102 From: Arif Ali <ma...@ar...> To: "Mailing list, xCAT" <xca...@li...> Date: 08/18/2011 12:08 PM Subject: [xcat-user] xcatd logging/debugging Hi list, I was wondering if this change is a good idea or not, as I tend to make this change on most if not all of my installs so that i can get debugging information, or is the consensus that if debugging is required then make the relevant modifications for that purpose. --- xcatd.orig 2011-08-18 17:00:02.000000000 +0100 +++ xcatd 2011-08-18 17:00:29.000000000 +0100 @@ -198,8 +198,8 @@ xCAT::MsgUtils->message("S","Can't read /dev/null: $!"); die; } - open STDOUT, '>/dev/null'; - open STDERR, '>/dev/null'; + open STDOUT, '>> /var/log/xcat.log'; + open STDERR, '>> /var/log/xcat.log'; $0='xcatd'; $progname = \$0; if (! setsid) { -- Arif Ali catch me on freenode IRC, username: arif-ali ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2 _______________________________________________ xCAT-user mailing list xCA...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user |