From: ATSUKOM at jp.ibm.c. (A. Miyashita) - 2003-09-08 07:43:02
|
Dear all, Would you just give me an idea... we're wondering if we should stick to Cisco or move onto other network switches for our cluster. We still want to use xCAT to manage the cluster. I think the good point for us to have Cisco switch is that we can collect the MAC address thru Cisco with xCAT. I just wonder if we can do the same thing with the Terminal Server... Equinox could do it, right ? Is it just enough for us to have iTouch IR40 to collect the MAC address, or we still have to have the Cisco switch ? Sorry about the ignorance, but we in Japan don't have iTouch terminal server (nobody sells one in Japan...) so we don't have an idea. Thank you for your help in advance ! ---------------------------------------------------- ATSUKO MIYASHITA Linux Support Center, SWSC, Technical Support - IBM Japan Tel : 03-5144-8648 ( ext. 1253-8648 ) / Fax : 03-3536-2900 e-mail : ATSUKOM?jp.ibm.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.xcat.org/pipermail/xcat-user/attachments/20030908/1d75e8bb/attachment.htm |