Re: [Xbyamp-develop] xbmp/yamp merge status

[Frodo <csh...@ho...>]

No need 2 get upset. Let me try 2 explain some things

first of all the source of the new xbmp/yamp is open for all yamp/xbmp
developers.
it's in CVS and I commit all changes I'm making on a daily basis
(just like with previous yamp versions)

The only thing which isn't in CVS is the freestyle.lib
this is a static library xbmp needs for compiling
till this very moment not a single line of code has changed in freestyle.lib
so no 2 put it in CVS anyway

The reason for not to putting the freestyle.lib in CVS is because runtime
asked me 2
He doesn't want some weirdo releasing a version we didn't build. Also he
doesnt want people
asking him questions about beta code. Please remember that when this
decission was made
both xbmp2 & the merged xbmp/yamp where in a very very alpha stage. let's
say not working @all

As said the freestyle lib will be added @ 14 december when we got a build
which works reasonable well if not good and one we all can support
so from then on ALL code will be in CVS and offcourse updated when somebody
makes a change 2 it

As said, if any of the yamp/xbmp developers wants 2 have the complete source
I can
send him my copy which contains also the freestyle.lib
from then one he/she can keep up with the rest of us by getting the latest
changes from CVS

Frodo



----- Original Message -----
From: "Troed Sångberg" <tr...@ap...>
To: "Albert Soler" <my...@bt...>
Cc: <xby...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Xbyamp-develop] xbmp/yamp merge status


> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Albert Soler wrote:
>
> > I don't wish to get into a protracted debate so I'll sumarise by saying
that
> > this was a concession I asked Frodo to make if we merged both projects
(as
> > it turns out this happened a lot quicker, and it looked like a .62 build
of
>
> > In any case, after the 14th Dec the project reverts to daily updates to
the
> > CVS ala yamp.
>
> I see absolutely no reason for this to happen at a specific date, or why
> it can't happen now. Why did you ask Frodo for this?
>
> One of the reasons I choose to code for yamp instead of xbmp was that the
> authors behind xbmp didn't seem to care a bit about open sorce
> development. With the source in the CVS I don't see why you're withholding
> other parts - is it about _control_? Being the only ones able to put a
> binary together?
>
> Please explain, maybe you have rational reasons after all.
>
> /me - professional software developer
>
> --
>
> - I support the Palestinians, and so would you if you opened your eyes
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET
> comprehensive development tool, built to increase your
> productivity. Try a free online hosted session at:
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en
> _______________________________________________
> Xbyamp-develop mailing list
> Xby...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xbyamp-develop
>