From: Rintze Z. <rin...@gm...> - 2011-04-28 15:16:30
|
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Bruce D'Arcus <bd...@gm...> wrote: > What do you mean by "branch off the CSL 1.0 locales"? > For gender-specific ordinals, I prefer to use the syntax proposed here: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26629141 That approach could confuse CSL 1.0 processors (which could use the wrong ordinal, see https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/issues/7#issuecomment-941152), and CSL locales with the gender-specific ordinals wouldn't validate against the CSL 1.0 schema. So I think it might make sense to create a 1.0 branch for the CSL 1.0 locales at https://github.com/citation-style-language/locales, like we have for the CSL 0.8 locales. Rintze |