From: DH <cra...@ya...> - 2003-02-23 01:59:07
|
I have no statistics on the overhead aside from the fact that it is extra overhead. XRC.dll is an extra 120-500kb (upx?) if you're using App::Packer and the like. > I think that an XRC2Perl thing would be nice for smaller projects or to make > packaging and distribution easy. But in the long run, I think it would make > maintainance difficult. Two completely separate issues. The main purpose would be to reduce overhead. I never plan to develop interfaces by hand anymore, but when I do distribute programs, I never plan to distribute .xrc files anymore. > As for inlining the XRC, have you thought about writing a FileSystemHandler > and just passing it the XRC from <DATA>? > I have not. I would like to see it happen, but I don't know what it takes (from what I could discern, it's way too much work for me to do on my own). __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ |