Hi,
John Labenski ha scritto:
> On 3/3/06, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I wonder: should we add a changelog in doc/ folder ?
>> If yes, which format should we use ? I think HTML is not very
>> appropriated in this case but this is a matter of taste...
>
> Yes! I've been meaning to do that, but I've forgotten. I'll (or
> whomever) add it the next time I change something. I agree that text
> is best for this file.
I've added a simple changelog.txt in docs\
Please anyone add a brief summary of changes between pre-SF release and
actual sources.
>
>> PS: I'm still slowly working on the autopackage - it will take still
>> many days - meanwhile I think we could do the 2.6.2.0 release, don't you
>> think so ?
>
> See other message.
which msg ?
>
>> So that we can have some user feedback for the upcoming 2.6.3.0... ;)
>
> Agreed.
in this case, can we fix a release date ?
I would make 2.6.2.0 the 6/03, this monday. I'll be available all the
morning so I'll be able to do all packaging steps and upload archives to
SF release system...
Please let me know if you all agree,
Francesco
|
