wxlua-users

[wxlua-users] lua or wxlua-lua.exe

[klaas.holwerda <kho...@xs...>]

Hi,

I read lua5.1.lib was needed. So this exe renaming is not a mistake??
I keep changing pack and forth, i don't know any what is right :-(
Will it hopefully be  the same naming on Unix?

Klaas

Re: [wxlua-users] lua or wxlua-lua.exe

[Francesco M. <f18...@ya...>]

klaas.holwerda ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> I read lua5.1.lib was needed. So this exe renaming is not a mistake??
> I keep changing pack and forth, i don't know any what is right :-(
> Will it hopefully be  the same naming on Unix?
very sorry about that.

"lua" is now the definitive name (unless others find problems with it) 
of the lua interpreter which gets built together with wxLua.

In this way, if the user does not have Lua installed and he compiles and 
installs wxLua, he end up with an "official" (i.e installed in the 
standard paths and with standard naming) lua + wxLua.
In fact lua libraries are now called lua5.1 and are installed in 
$LIBDIR. Exactly like lua packages would do.

Francesco

Re: [wxlua-users] lua or wxlua-lua.exe

[John L. <jla...@gm...>]

On 12/20/06, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote:
> klaas.holwerda ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I read lua5.1.lib was needed. So this exe renaming is not a mistake??
> > I keep changing pack and forth, i don't know any what is right :-(
> > Will it hopefully be  the same naming on Unix?
> very sorry about that.
>
> "lua" is now the definitive name (unless others find problems with it)
> of the lua interpreter which gets built together with wxLua.
>
> In this way, if the user does not have Lua installed and he compiles and
> installs wxLua, he end up with an "official" (i.e installed in the
> standard paths and with standard naming) lua + wxLua.
> In fact lua libraries are now called lua5.1 and are installed in
> $LIBDIR. Exactly like lua packages would do.

Sounds good to me.

John Labenski