Hi,
John Labenski ha scritto:
> On 2/21/06, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> John Labenski ha scritto:
>>> On 2/21/06, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote:
>>>> Hi John,
>>>> I see there are various project files and Makefiles not
>>>> bakefile-generated scattered among the wxLua tree... could we remove them ?
>>>>
>>>> If the makefiles are still up2date, I think we could keep them as
>>>> 'safety' system in case bakefile-generated ones fail in some way.
>>> I use all the "old" Makefiles regularly and I would like them to stay.
>>> They are based on wx-config and should work in linux on any system
>>> that has wx-config in their path. They're also very easy to understand
>>> so that I can add profiling and other temporary things easily.
>> ok, sure.
>> Just one question: is there anything in hand-written makefiles which you
>> can't do with ./configure ?
>
> Heh, I can understand the hand written ones and they're easy to
> modify. The bakefile Makefiles are basically incomprehensible, there's
> way too many conditions to make it parseable by a mortal at a glance.
that's true but rather bakefile themselves should be modified.
However I know that current situation (being forced to use a patched
bakefile) makes this not easy.
>
> If the existing makefiles conflict with something, we can rename them
> to Makefile.wx-config.
no need to do that; they do not conflict with anything as long as they
remain as they are...
Francesco
|
