Re: [wxlua-users] Rez now called (was Re: wxLua on wxMac)

[<af...@al...>]

Francesco Montorsi wrote:

> I'll look at the diffs of the Makefile.in trying to look if I can get
> applications to link against versioned libraries of wxLua, i.e. the
> *-2.8.0.0.0.dylib libraries.
>
> That is the right thing to do, isn't it?
>
> Also, is it common on Mac to have versioned libraries named like
> *-2.8.0.0.0.dylib (5 numbers!)?

The name of the library is "libwx_macu-2.8" (i.e. 2.8 is part of name)
The API (major) version is 0, thus libwx_macu-2.8.0.dylib (the lib id)
The implementation/minor version is 0.0.0, yielding all five numbers:

libwx_macu-2.8.dylib -> libwx_macu-2.8.0.dylib
libwx_macu-2.8.0.dylib -> libwx_macu-2.8.0.0.0.dylib
libwx_macu-2.8.0.0.0.dylib

I think it's done the same way on Linux ? The first library/symlink
is only for developer use, since programs link to an API version.
(only that Macs are more sensitive to the file suffix, than Linux)

libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so -> libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so.0
libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so.0 -> libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so.0.0.0
libwx_gtk2u-2.8.so.0.0.0

> I don't have the non-corrupted version of wxLua.icns... could you send
> it to me then?

http://www.algonet.se/~afb/wx/wxLua.icns
http://www.algonet.se/~afb/wx/wxLua.r.gz

> this is not a bug. This is wanted. Better not to mess with the wx's
> include folder. /usr/local/include/wx  (unversioned) is a safer place.

Okay, but it didn't seem to find the headers there for some reason ?

--anders