From: klaas.holwerda <kho...@xs...> - 2006-12-10 14:13:42
|
John Labenski wrote: > > > What about just using the wxlike-lib for wxlua too? That way the > wxCode bakefiles will be able to use the libs it generates very > easily. This is why I'm so interested in naming all the libs using > wxWidgets like the wxWidgets libs since it becomes easy to mix > everything together. > So i think you want wxlua_msw28d_wxbind.lib Renamed to wxmsw28d_wxbind.lib. In the last i see now wxlua, this is why we once decide to use wxlua_ as a sort of name space. I am not sure why wxCode prefers it different. I understand for one lib project there is no confusion. But for project with several modules, i don't like it. Like in wxArt2d i have 16 libraries coming from 16 modules. If there is no name space at the start like wxart2d_mswd28d_curves.lib wxart2d_mswd28d_kbool.lib etc. i think it will be harder to find out what library comes from what after installation. Looking at the wxWidgets naming , i also see wxbase28.lib, next to wxmsw28_core and wxmsw28_stc, i don't see the logic. I only see "wx" as common namespace, why did they not use wxmsw in front of all?? Anyway it seems that all contrib stuff is in the from wxmsw28_nameofcontrib. So looking at it like that maybe we should have: wxmsw28d_wxlua_lua.lib wxmsw28d_wxlua_bind.lib wxmsw28d_wxlua_debug.lib wxmsw28d_wxlua_socket.lib etc. or if oke: wxmsw28d_lua_lua.lib wxmsw28d_lua_bind.lib wxmsw28d_lua_debug.lib wxmsw28d_lua_socket.lib In the end for wxstedit, it is not: wxmsw28d_wxstedit.lib but: wxmsw28d_stedit.lib So only one time the wx in it. Like: wxnamespace+platform+version_libraryset_specificModule.lib What do we think is best? Klaas |