From: klaas.holwerda <kho...@xs...> - 2006-12-10 08:32:53
|
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > well, looking better at your post, probably my changes won't help you. > It looks like wxStEdit and wxBindSTC are not fully 2.8-ready... > Not only, its seems to be in both, i think 2.7.2 was different, and 2.8.3 was like 2.6 again when it comes to those functions. >>> Next i did not find lua5.1.exe anymore? Is that right? I used it to >>> generate my own bindings. >>> Should i use wxLua.exe?? >>> > no, just wxlua-lua.exe . However I'm not still 100% sure we are settled > down with that name. > > Just as for the name of the vanilla lua library which we build in wxLua, > I've some doubt. We have two choices: > > 1) call it using "standard" lua names (lua5.1.lib and lua.exe) and > overwrite the user's system-wide installations of these files when doing > "make install" > I would have no problem with this, but have the same on MSW and Unix. But installing is not needed i think?? > 2) call it using wxLua-way of naming so we're sure we don't override > anything. > Fine too :-) Better i think, since it is only for us. > Currently I've setup bakefiles to go with #2 but I have the feeling I'm > missing something which may go in favour of #1.... do I ? > The think i need on MSW and Unix is a lua executable, to generate my binding ( Cmake, so all happens on CLient side ). So ideally, i take it from wxLua. The name is not so important, but i prefer no 5.1 in it, since it makes the scripts version dependent without need in my case. Regards Klaas |