Re: [Wxlua-users] (int) should be int

[John L. <jla...@gm...>]

On 8/11/06, Klaas Holwerda <db...@nl...> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Labenski wrote:
> Unfortunately we
> > need a nice way to systematically name the libs uniformly, ideally
> > using the exact same syntax for the build settings that wxWidgets
> > uses. (I have asked about that on wx-dev years ago, but the need for
> > this fell on deaf ears unfortunately) I think that we (I and other
> > wxCode people) should add this naming ability to our bakefiles, but
> > I'm not sure how to go about just yet.
>
> I find the way the wxlua libs are named rather nice. And i thought the
> idea is to have it the way wxwidgets does it. Only wxlua in front of it.
> We discussed this when the whole bakefile stuff started fro wxLua.
> Why not use the same for stedit or any other wxCode project? Do you not
> like it?

I do like it, but it has to be implemented. The only problem is when
to find the time. :(

Regards,
    John Labenski