Re: [Wxlua-users] still bindings problems

[John L. <jla...@gm...>]

On 6/8/06, klaas.holwerda <kla...@nl...> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Labenski wrote:
> > On 6/7/06, klaas.holwerda <kla...@nl...> wrote:
> >
> >> Your idea to add precompiled headers like this does not work. Also
> >> othere changed you said you made, made no difference.
> >>
> >> hook_cpp_binding_header_includes = "#include
> >> \"general/include/a2dprec.h\"\n..#include \"wxbind/include/wxbind.h\"\n"
> >>
> >> I think the only thing that will be correct is to place the next at as
> >> the first include file in *.cpp generated.
> >> This is what the comment says, and how it worked before.
> >>
> >
> > As I said, just reverting the change will break compilation on X
> > Windows systems since the X windows headers very selfishly #define
> > "Above" and "Below" to be numbers and you have to #undef them *after*
> > including them.
> >
> After some searching i found those in wx_rules.lua. I first had no idea
> what you were talking about :-)
> But indeed how did the come up to use such defines??
> Should they also be placed in say wxluacan_rules.lua, in order to make
> it work on Linux?
> Sofar i did not see a problem on Linux RedHat, but on Suse there are. So
> maybe this is what is the reason.
> Lost my Suse install, so can't check it for the moment.

You only need them if you have a function or something called
Above(...) or Below(...). wxWidgets #undefs them in wx/layout.h since
the layout constraints class has those functions. I've actually made
the bindings #ifdef the layout constraints for < wxchkver26 since
sizers have been around since 2.2 IIRC.

So, no we don't need to add them elsewhere unless there is a
compliation problem.

-John