From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2006-05-08 15:50:18
|
John Labenski ha scritto: > On 5/8/06, Francesco Montorsi > <f18...@ya...> wrote: >> John Labenski ha scritto: >> > On 5/7/06, Steve Kieu <ha...@ya...> >> > wrote: >> >> One comment, If you allow the configure flags --enable-wxlua-debug=no >> >> then >> >> configure should >> >> >> >> - Whether build wxlua without debug and remove the linking flags so it >> >> builds wxlua >> >> - Or completely disable the building of wxlua; so only library will be >> >> built. >> >> >> >> As I disable debug and when it link wxlua, it gives the error that no >> >> debug >> >> lib available (of course) ; If go to the make file remove the link >> >> flags it >> >> will give unresolve symbol ; so wxlua much depends on the debug >> options. >> > >> > Ok, I'll see what I can do about this. It's pretty harmless to just >> > build the debug library for now since its pretty small. >> I'm not sure to understand what's the problem here ? >> Is it that wxluaapp depends from wxluadebug module ? > > I think that what he's talking about. He wants to build wxlua without > the wxluadebug lib, but without explicitly telling it not to try to > compile the apps. > >> If yes just adding: >> >> <template id="wxluaapp" template="wxlua" cond="WXLUADEBUG=='1'"> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> to apps\build\bakefiles\apps.bkl will do it... >> >> let me know if I should apply this and rebake... > > That would be great. done - BTW if there are other dependencies from other modules in app_wxlua, app_wxluaedit, app_wxluacan or app_wxluafreeze, just let me know and I'll add them. Francesco PS: there is some (slow) movement on bakefile patch tracker - with a bit of luck and the application of some other patches, this summer I'll be able to change slightly wxLua bakefiles to use standard bakefile (which now includes uninstall & header support)... |