From: John L. <jla...@gm...> - 2006-02-23 16:07:55
|
On 2/23/06, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote: > John Labenski ha scritto: > > On 2/21/06, klaas.holwerda <kho...@xs...> wrote: > >>>> If so we might pay less attention to VC6 which is not to good i thin= k. > >>> I think MSVC6 is going to be completely 'deprecated' in few years... > >> That is what i think too. But at the moment? > >>> maybe we could: > >>> a) move msvc6 project files in the new build\msvc6 folders > >>> b) convert msvc6 project files and add them in the build\msvc7/8 fold= ers > >> Good idea. > >>> Unfortunately AFAIK MSVC.NET and MSVC2005 use two different formats..= . > >>> I'm going to see if I can add these formats to bakefile. > > > > But, don't they both support converting from dsp files to their sln > > files? I use 2005, the free one new and I've also used .NET (a few > > years back) and both converted the dsp files just fine. You had to be > > careful about deleting the sln files if you edited the dsp files, but > > that wasn't a big deal. > yes, they support it but having the SLN file directly is more > comfortable for the end user, isn't it? > > Please let me know if you agree to do this change (build\msvc6 and > build\msvc8) since I need to know that before completing install.html doc Well, sure, if it's easy to do, why not? I usually go for the minimal approach, I got a lot on my plate right now. John Labenski |