From: Francesco M. <f18...@ya...> - 2006-02-23 13:23:09
|
Hi, John Labenski ha scritto: > On 2/21/06, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> John Labenski ha scritto: >>> On 2/21/06, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote: >>>> Hi John, >>>> I see there are various project files and Makefiles not >>>> bakefile-generated scattered among the wxLua tree... could we remove them ? >>>> >>>> If the makefiles are still up2date, I think we could keep them as >>>> 'safety' system in case bakefile-generated ones fail in some way. >>> I use all the "old" Makefiles regularly and I would like them to stay. >>> They are based on wx-config and should work in linux on any system >>> that has wx-config in their path. They're also very easy to understand >>> so that I can add profiling and other temporary things easily. >> ok, sure. >> Just one question: is there anything in hand-written makefiles which you >> can't do with ./configure ? > > Heh, I can understand the hand written ones and they're easy to > modify. The bakefile Makefiles are basically incomprehensible, there's > way too many conditions to make it parseable by a mortal at a glance. that's true but rather bakefile themselves should be modified. However I know that current situation (being forced to use a patched bakefile) makes this not easy. > > If the existing makefiles conflict with something, we can rename them > to Makefile.wx-config. no need to do that; they do not conflict with anything as long as they remain as they are... Francesco |