From: John L. <jla...@gm...> - 2006-02-21 22:48:34
|
On 2/21/06, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote: > Hi, > > John Labenski ha scritto: > > On 2/21/06, Francesco Montorsi <f18...@ya...> wrote: > >> Hi John, > >> I see there are various project files and Makefiles not > >> bakefile-generated scattered among the wxLua tree... could we remove t= hem ? > >> > >> If the makefiles are still up2date, I think we could keep them as > >> 'safety' system in case bakefile-generated ones fail in some way. > > > > I use all the "old" Makefiles regularly and I would like them to stay. > > They are based on wx-config and should work in linux on any system > > that has wx-config in their path. They're also very easy to understand > > so that I can add profiling and other temporary things easily. > ok, sure. > Just one question: is there anything in hand-written makefiles which you > can't do with ./configure ? Heh, I can understand the hand written ones and they're easy to modify. The bakefile Makefiles are basically incomprehensible, there's way too many conditions to make it parseable by a mortal at a glance. If the existing makefiles conflict with something, we can rename them to Makefile.wx-config. -John Labenski |