Re: [Wxlua-users] wxLua documentation

[John L. <jla...@gm...>]

On 2/13/06, k. holwerda <kla...@nl...> wrote:
> >>please please HTML, it is so much better. And for editing www.nvu.com i=
s
> >>free and good.
> >
> >I dunno, I think everyone else always just uses text files, in fact I
> >can't remember ever using a project that has them in any other form.
> >
> I can, you are working to much on Linux.
> On windows it is hlp/chm or html.
> But i went through my tool dir, even many linux orginating tools use
> often html or redirect
> through a readme file to docs/index.html.
> We can not do hlp/chm but for platfrom independent tooling html is no
> problem.
>
> >They're a lot easier to read on the command line.
> >
> Like i say ;-)
>
> >I don't envision a large amount of documentation for wxLua, just
> >build, install, usage, and differences to the wxWidgets c++ docs.
> >
> I wish there was some more.  Like how it is organized internal , source
> documentation in doxygen.
>
> I still vote for HTML.

Allright, I'll try nvu. I've tried in the past to use a WYSIWYG to
write really simple, clean, readable HTML and found that the Mozilla
editor was the best, but every now and then it would really garble
things up. I think they can get very confused and stick in millions of
&nbsp and trash the layout of tables. The HTML they generate is fine,
but it's completely unreadable as text.

Regards,
    John Labenski