Re: [Wxlua-users] wxLua documentation

[k. h. <kla...@nl...>]

John Labenski wrote:

>On 2/12/06, klaas.holwerda <kho...@xs...> wrote:
>  
>
>>Francesco Montorsi wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>  since build system is now quite stable I'd like to write a few notes
>>>about it for users.
>>>
>>>I see that there are some .txt files in docs\ but before updating them
>>>(I would touch only building.txt anyway), I think we should decide if
>>>we want to keep them as plain TXT file or choose HTML (wxArt2d has a
>>>nice install.html:
>>>http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/wxart2d/wxArt2D/install.html)...
>>>
>>>
>>>Just let me know,
>>>      
>>>
>>please please HTML, it is so much better. And for editing www.nvu.com is
>>free and good.
>>    
>>
>
>I dunno, I think everyone else always just uses text files, in fact I
>can't remember ever using a project that has them in any other form.
>  
>
I can, you are working to much on Linux.
On windows it is hlp/chm or html.
But i went through my tool dir, even many linux orginating tools use 
often html or redirect
through a readme file to docs/index.html.
We can not do hlp/chm but for platfrom independent tooling html is no 
problem.

>They're a lot easier to read on the command line.
>  
>
Like i say ;-)

>I don't envision a large amount of documentation for wxLua, just
>build, install, usage, and differences to the wxWidgets c++ docs.
>  
>
I wish there was some more.  Like how it is organized internal , source 
documentation in doxygen.

I still vote for HTML.

Regards,

Klaas




-- 
Unclassified